In education system, assessment through formal written examination still valid?
These days, there is an ongoing debate about （whether written exams still valid or not）. While it is possible to claim that (written tests are not always the best way to assess learning), my view is that (this evaluation method still needs to be adopted). In this essay, I shall explain my point of view by analyzing both sides of the argument.
On the one hand, there are several solid reasons why (written exams) are considered to be advantageous. One of them is that (formal written exams are the most effective and efficient way to evaluate students’ learning progress on a regular basis). Also, it should be taken into account that (sometimes written exams can create competition among test-takers, which would push them to do their best).
On the other hand, those who argue against (written exams) hold a different view. Firstly, it is claimed that (exams are likely to be biased because they only judge a students’ ability under set conditions and limited time). Then, there are concerns about (the stress caused by written exams, which will damage a student’s mental health).
In conclusion, while there are strong arguments on both sides of the case, I firmly believe that (written examination is still an indispensable part of the current education system).